Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/5974
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Loveness Muyengwa-Mapuva | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Jephias Mapuva | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-27T07:57:52Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-27T07:57:52Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/5974 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The concept of citizen participation has come to be closely associated with democracy. While the two concepts share a lot in common, there has been a tendency by those in power to manipulate the socially marginalized in the name of citizen participation and democracy. Electoral processes have produced disputed results because although citizens will have partaken in the electoral process, but in most cases they got the leadership that they do not deserve. This has resulted in the Government of National Unity [GNUs] formations in recent times, mostly popularized by incumbent political leaders who do not want to accept electoral defeat. Electoral processes have been instituted as a manifestation of citizen participation in the decision-making processes in efforts to decide who should preside over a state. Bureaucrats have manipulated the concept of citizen participation for their own political survival through enacting legislation that would render citizen involvement a formality where genuine participation would have yielded beneficial results for the people. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | The Global Index for Contuing Resources | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Politics and Good Governance | en_US |
dc.subject | Citizen participation | en_US |
dc.subject | democracy | en_US |
dc.subject | dichotomy | en_US |
dc.subject | bureaucracy | en_US |
dc.subject | electoral processes | en_US |
dc.subject | Government of National Unity | en_US |
dc.title | The Citizen participation democracy dichotomy | en_US |
dc.type | research article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://onlineresearchjournals.com/ijopagg/art/151.pdf | - |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Department of Law Procedural Law | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Bindura University of Science Education, Department of Geography (Development Studies), Astra Campus, Bindura, Zimbabwe | en_US |
dc.relation.issn | 0976 – 1195 | en_US |
dc.description.volume | 5 | en_US |
dc.description.issue | 5.2 | en_US |
dc.description.startpage | 1 | en_US |
dc.description.endpage | 17 | en_US |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.openairetype | research article | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
Appears in Collections: | Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Citizen participation democracy dichotomy.pdf | Abstract | 82.26 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
170
checked on Nov 28, 2024
Download(s)
20
checked on Nov 28, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.