Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/1206
Title: | Comparisons of sugar blend 1 plus fertilizer over straight fertilizer as basal application on growth and yield of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L). |
Authors: | Chandiposha, Misheck Kunedzimwe, Ngonidzashe Gwazane, Munyaradzi Chiriman’ombe, Daniel |
Keywords: | Sugarcane, Sugar blend, Straight fertilizer, Sugarcane varieties |
Issue Date: | 2014 |
Publisher: | INNSPUB |
Series/Report no.: | International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research (IJAAR);Vol. 4, No. 4:,89-93 |
Abstract: | An investigation to compare sugar blend 1 plus with straight fertilizers (single super phosphate and muriate of potash) as basal fertilizer was carried out at Hippo Valley Estates in the 2012/13 growing season.A 2x3 factorial experiment in a Randomised Complete Block Design with 3 replications was used. The first factor was fertilizer type which consisted of two levels, sugar blend 1 plus and straight fertilizer and the second factor was variety with the following levels N14, Zn10 and Nco376.The results showed that there was no interaction (p<0.05) between fertilizer type and variety on number of sugarcane tillers, stalks, sugarcane height and yield. However, there was significant difference (p< 0.05) between the fertilizer types on number of sugarcane tillers, stalks, sugarcane height and yield. Also varieties had significant difference on yield. Sugar blend 1 plus fertilizer increased the number of tillers, primary stalks, cane height and yield when compared to straight fertilizer. The cane yield in treatments applied sugar blend 1 plus increased by 24% when compared to use of straight fertilizer, from 87.2 to 108.4 tonnes / hectare. |
URI: | https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/33473468 |
ISSN: | 2223-7054 |
Appears in Collections: | Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
An investigation to compare sugar blend 1 plus with straight fertilizers.pdf | Abstract | 120.56 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.